Geoff Canyon Rev
gcanyon+rev at gmail.com
Sat Feb 18 21:45:05 CST 2012
This is the entire function definition, with the comment in place:
function roundUp x,i -- rounds x up to the next i
return x div i * i + item itemoffset((x mod i > 0),"true,false") of (i,0)
I only included the first line in my original question because it's the
only line with a comment.
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 9:39 PM, Joe Lewis Wilkins <pepetoo at cox.net> wrote:
> Kind of true Geoff, but the call would have arguments in place of
> parameters, whereas
> function roundUp x,i isn't the function's definition either. Not
> intending to nit-pick.
> Joe Wilkins
> On Feb 18, 2012, at 7:01 PM, Geoff Canyon Rev wrote:
> > ? That is the definition (and not a call).
> > On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Joe Lewis Wilkins <pepetoo at cox.net>
> >> Certainly better than nothing; but, if you put it in the function
> >> definition instead of the calls, you only have to do it one time.
> >> Joe Wilkins
> >> On Feb 18, 2012, at 12:04 PM, gcanyon+rev wrote:
> >>> I'm curious what you think of this, which is what I try to do regularly
> >> when I create one-liners (which I favor).
> >>> function roundUp x,i -- rounds x up to the next i
> >>> On Feb 18, 2012, at 11:23 AM, Joe Lewis Wilkins <pepetoo at cox.net>
> >>>> If you're going to use one liners like this, you'd better add some
> >> commentary.
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> subscription preferences:
More information about the use-livecode