Search, Replace and Unicode
Richmond
richmondmathewson at gmail.com
Sat Dec 29 14:52:58 EST 2012
On 12/29/2012 09:38 PM, Phil Davis wrote:
> Hi Richmond,
>
> Just curious - does setting the lockMessages & lockScreen to true
> speed it up any? Or hiding the field? (Sorry if these have already
> been answered; I'm not following the thread too closely)
I really don't know as I am so "thick" those possibilities had not
occurred to me.
However, I cracked open my monster Sanskrit font and looked at it
FontForge and realised that I was being fairly bl**dy silly crunching
through
thousands of irrelevant unicode addresses, so chopped things up into 3
REPEAT UNTIL loops for the unicode ranges that were relevant to my work:
2325 - 2431
57354 - 58498
61952 - 62738
giving a saving of some 58371 interations!!!! and boiling the whole
thing down to about 5 seconds . . . that is on the same sample text I
previously used.
HOWEVER . . . now I will play around with setting lockMessages and
lockScreen as per your suggestions to see if there is any appreciable gain.
Phil; you state that you are "not following the thread too closely"; is
that because it is not something that interests you, or do you have a
stake in Unicode text manipulation but have been busy elsewhere.
I sometimes get the feeling (err . . . paranoid) that I am the only
person using RR Livecode who is doing 'serious sh*t' with unicodeText;
but, hey, why should I worry?; in 1985, at the University of Durham, I
was the only student trying to process text with PASCAL 5 while all the
Physics students were crunching numbers.
>
>
> On 12/29/12 8:18 AM, Richmond wrote:
>> ran it through unicode addresses from 2325 to 62738, which took about
>> 90 seconds, which is rather too long, so
>> will cut that down to run through several ranges of unicode addresses
>> rather than the whole shebang.
>
More information about the use-livecode
mailing list