The Owner of a background group

[J. Landman Gay]

On 8/21/12 10:50 AM, Bob Sneidar wrote:
> Hmmm now that I am thinking about it with a full cup of coffee
> surging through my veins, I seem to remember Jacque mentioning in the
> past that a background group really belongs to the stack as a whole
> from a certain point of view, although as Craig says, for the
> purposes of the message path it has to belong to some card, and may
> as well be the current card.

In my mental framework, a card group should belong to the card it's on, 
and a background group should be owned by the stack. But maybe that's 
just me.

-- 
Jacqueline Landman Gay         |     jacque at hyperactivesw.com
HyperActive Software           |     http://www.hyperactivesw.com