Efficiency question for list modification

[Bob Sneidar]

How about chunking the data with the new method? I would put money on the notion that it won't matter much. 

Bob


On Mar 10, 2011, at 1:25 PM, Nonsanity wrote:

> I didn't use that style because he mentioned he tried it without much
> success. I tried it down on the straight-up 100,000 pass and it finished in
> 4 seconds. Hands down the fastest. I should have tried that on my own just
> for completeness' sake.
> 
> I guess I was too taken with the faster results I got from chunking the
> data. This happens to researchers that aren't careful about what they pay
> attention to. It can lead to all sorts of horrendous things... Like
> reporting positive results for psi experiments or homeopathy. :)
> 
> Hidden assumptions taint research results. My bad here.
> 
> The stack has been updated to include the fifth button that uses that style.
> Result: 1 seconds. :)
> 
> ~ Chris Innanen