Backscript behavior
Bob Sneidar
bobs at twft.com
Fri Mar 4 16:18:40 EST 2011
You would have to pass checkBack for that to be a valid test wouldn't you?
Bob
On Mar 4, 2011, at 12:18 PM, DunbarX at aol.com wrote:
> Jacques:
>
>
> If I have this in a button script:
>
>
> on mouseUp
> checkBack
> end mouseUp
>
>
> and this in a stack script:
>
>
>
> on checkBack
> put ""
> wait 20
> put random(99)
> end checkBack
>
>
>
>
>
>
> and then insert that stack script into back, I still only get one random number. Is that what you meant, that you might get two?
>
>
> And by the way, answers are what we expect from you, not questions.
>
>
> Craig
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: J. Landman Gay <jacque at hyperactivesw.com>
> To: LiveCode Mailing List <use-livecode at lists.runrev.com>
> Sent: Fri, Mar 4, 2011 3:04 pm
> Subject: Backscript behavior
>
>
> Somebody preserve my sanity here...if a stack script is inserted into the back, and you happen to be working in that stack, are called handlers executed twice?
>
> I'm getting some weird results. The message watcher says they aren't, and lists only one call for each handler. But the debugger steps through each one twice.
>
> I'm inclined to think it's a debugger issue, but if not, it would explain some weird behaviors I'm seeing in my stack.
>
> -- Jacqueline Landman Gay | jacque at hyperactivesw.com
> HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
More information about the use-livecode
mailing list