Anyone using MobGUI?

[Chipp Walters]

Aren't all purchasers of a product like this developers by default? Why
would end users ever delve into application code? Certainly, I've never
tried looking at the source code for a commercial application, even when
available. And, mostly code in stacks can't be edited unless you're in an LC
IDE.

Not sure what your point is.

On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 11:22 PM, Pete <pete at mollysrevenge.com> wrote:

> I'm just starting to consider this issue so glad it's being discussed.  I
> think protection of stacks that are incorporated into other products is
> perhaps more to do with protecting them from end users rather than the
> developers who incorporate them into their products.  I would gladly give
> the password to my stacks to another developer, but
> would definitely hesitate to give it to an end user.  To me, it's not an
> issue of piracy, more of someone who doesn't know what they're doing
> changing my code and then expecting support for it when it crashes.
>
> Pete
> Molly's Revenge <http://www.mollysrevenge.com>
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 8:57 PM, Chipp Walters <chipp at chipp.com> wrote:
>
> > Can't someone just lend the whole plugin? I know with altBrowser and
> > altSQLite and altFont, all you needed was a regcode and you were good to
> > go.
> >
> > I guess what I'm saying, is you're never going to stop the pirates. They
> > won't pay no matter what. Most of us in the commercial space know this
> and
> > we instead try and focus on stopping casual 'lenders' of software- if at
> > all
> > possible.
> >
> > My thinking with regard to copy protection is once you make it too
> > difficult
> > for your honest users, you've lost-- and they will look to other
> solutions.
> >
> > On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 10:51 PM, J. Landman Gay <
> jacque at hyperactivesw.com
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > On 7/3/11 10:30 PM, Chipp Walters wrote:
> > >
> > >> On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 7:03 AM, John Craig<john at splash21.com>  wrote:
> > >>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> The scripts are protected - if I can generate some revenue from the
> > >>> plugin,
> > >>> then I can dedicate time to developing it further.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >> I'm not sure exactly the correlation between scripts being protected
> and
> > >> generating revenue from them. I've been involved with this community
> > since
> > >> the very start and can't recall anyone ripping off someone else's
> > scripts,
> > >> thus causing a loss of revenue to the developer.
> > >>
> > >
> > > I agree we're a pretty good bunch. But I believe most or all the market
> > > vendors protect their scripts. Without that, it's too easy for someone
> to
> > > "lend" the script to someone else. I don't begrudge them a bit of
> > > protection, and it doesn't seem to have hurt sales.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Jacqueline Landman Gay         |     jacque at hyperactivesw.com
> > > HyperActive Software           |     http://www.hyperactivesw.com
> > >
> > >
> > > ______________________________**_________________
> > > use-livecode mailing list
> > > use-livecode at lists.runrev.com
> > > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> > > subscription preferences:
> > > http://lists.runrev.com/**mailman/listinfo/use-livecode<
> > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode>
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Chipp Walters
> > CEO, Shafer Walters Group, Inc.
> > _______________________________________________
> > use-livecode mailing list
> > use-livecode at lists.runrev.com
> > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> > subscription preferences:
> > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
>



-- 
Chipp Walters
CEO, Shafer Walters Group, Inc.