send vs dispatch and continuously running processes

[Mike Bonner]

If you DO use a repeat loop, the 'wait <time> with messages' is pretty much
obligatory right? So you can setup an exit strategy and so that pending
messages (such as sends and dispatches) will still be processed, right?

On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 8:11 AM, <DunbarX at aol.com> wrote:

> I don't really know what you intend, but you probably do not want to lock
> yourself into a repeat loop. As others have suggested, "send in time with
> messages" is very effective, and then call that again:
>
> on myMessage
>
>   doYourStuff
>
>   send myMessage to me in 1 miilisecond with messages
>
> end myMessage
>
> Or someSuch.
>
> Craig Newman
> _______________________________________________
> use-revolution mailing list
> use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
>