[feature] did you guys knew that "?" is a valid character for function/command name?

[Alejandro Tejada]

Hi Alex,


Alex Tweedly wrote:
> 
> Not quite. We specify pass-by-ref by using '@' in the handler 
> specification; you can't use it in the calling script as Ben did in his 
> example in the email. Ben wants to be able to use the '@'
> (presumably as an option, with no actual effect) in the calling script,
> to help remind him that the variable will/may be changed within the
> handler.
> -- Alex.
> 

I have never used this method of "passing-by-reference"
i any of my stack, so actually i dont know how
useful it really is.

Did you read this message of Wilhelm Sanke about
image processing?

http://lists.runrev.com/pipermail/use-revolution/2010-March/136246.html

http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/Language-comparisons-Lua-simpler-and-faster-than-RevTalk-td1586669.html

http://www.mail-archive.com/use-revolution@lists.runrev.com/msg131812.html

Could be possible to speed up Wilhelm's handlers that process binary
image data using this method of "passing-by-reference"?

Thanks in advance!

Al

-- 
View this message in context: http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/feature-did-you-guys-knew-that-is-a-valid-character-for-function-command-name-tp2527567p2530061.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.