sockets & post to url

Andre Garzia andre at andregarzia.com
Thu Sep 2 18:21:06 EDT 2010


Once I built a web server in Rev... for a while, I tried testing it by
building a client also in Rev. Now, when everything is running at the same
time inside Rev IDE, things can get messy...



On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 7:03 PM, Monte Goulding
<monte at sweattechnologies.com>wrote:

> LOL, just a bug in my code mate. Was closing line 1 of the opensockets
> which was fine when the licensing stuff was happening in a separate process
> but not when I put it back in the main app ;-)
>
> On 03/09/2010, at 12:45 AM, Andre Garzia wrote:
>
> > Monte,
> >
> > can you detail how you solved this for future mail list search abilities!
> >
> > :D
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 4:27 AM, Monte Goulding
> > <monte at sweattechnologies.com>wrote:
> >
> >> ah... scratch that, nothing to see here
> >>
> >> On 02/09/2010, at 5:14 PM, Monte Goulding wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi
> >>>
> >>> I have an app that accepts connections on a socket to sync to an iOS
> >> version.
> >>>
> >>> post to url works before and after:
> >>> accept connections on port lPort with message "newConnection" -- lPort
> is
> >> 8009 as default but user settable
> >>> until the connections start coming in from the server. To avoid socket
> >> timeouts while the user does some licensing stuff the phone repeatedly
> asks
> >> if it's ok to sync and the app either responds with an accept, reject or
> >> pending message. While these connections are coming in post to url does
> not
> >> return although it doesn't block the UI either so you can click the
> button
> >> that sends the post again and then it returns immediately with "error
> >> Previous request not completed" as result. The docs say url commands
> block
> >> each other but no mention of other socket connections blocking them too.
> >>>
> >>> When the connections stop coming in from the phone (no open sockets but
> >> still listening) then post works again but not if you have tried to post
> to
> >> a url while the connections are coming in in which case you still get
> the
> >> error in the result. resetAll (libURLresetAll) does nothing for me.
> >>>
> >>> Is this a known bug?
> >>> Is there a workaround?
> >>>
> >>> Cheers
> >>>
> >>> Monte_______________________________________________
> >>> use-revolution mailing list
> >>> use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
> >>> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> >> subscription preferences:
> >>> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> use-revolution mailing list
> >> use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
> >> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> >> subscription preferences:
> >> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > http://www.andregarzia.com All We Do Is Code.
> > _______________________________________________
> > use-revolution mailing list
> > use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
> > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> subscription preferences:
> > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
>
> _______________________________________________
> use-revolution mailing list
> use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
>



-- 
http://www.andregarzia.com All We Do Is Code.



More information about the use-livecode mailing list