Brainfade time - what's the proper name for a 'local' handler?

[DunbarX at aol.com]

I have never seen a handler nested inside another. It would mean;

on soAndSo
   on doThis
   end doThis
end soAndSo

There must be a semantic misunderstanding here. Perhaps what is meant is a 
handler call:

on soAndSo
   doThis
end soAnd So

One might say that a handler sort of lives inside another.

Craig Newman
In a message dated 5/27/10 11:35:27 AM, rjb at robelko.com writes:


> No, that keeps it local to the object that contains the handler. I
> >*think* I'm talking about one handler nested inside another one.
>