Check out Jerry's new videos -- REV to ObjC -> iPhone
Randall Lee Reetz
randall at randallreetz.com
Sun May 9 18:16:34 CDT 2010
There is no technical reason that rev would have to export any pre-compiled code objects or libraries. Now, if what you aren't saying but meaning, is that rev would expose its internal data model and that this could expose the company to piracy of core IP, well that is an issue that should be expressed openly. The fact that any xtalk environment holds very little claim to deeply dependable IP is certainly true. When you don't own your core IP, the only option is to be better than other xtalk IDEs.
The courts have repeatedly told apple that they too must compete through consumer choice because their IP claims are unfounded (xerox owns that).
From: Colin Holgate <coiin at verizon.net>
Sent: Sunday, May 09, 2010 3:40 PM
To: How to use Revolution <use-revolution at lists.runrev.com>
Subject: Re: Check out Jerry's new videos -- REV to ObjC -> iPhone
On May 9, 2010, at 6:21 PM, Randall Lee Reetz wrote:
> No it isn't and I will be willing to bet a large sum that apple's only desire is to control the compiling process.
> And, importantly, they can not legally go beyond this level of control
And that might be part of the reason that the government will sue them.
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences:
More information about the use-livecode