Changing the Style of Words in Field And Quotation Marks?

[Michael Kann]

Peter, 

The current quoted-text convention might be useful if the developer is the one putting in the quotes. You use quotes instead of underscores. If you wanted a paragraph of musician names you add Madonna, Prince, "Bruce Springsteen" and Willie -- word 3 now refers to the Boss.

If you are munging other people's text then it becomes inconvenient.

Mike

--- On Tue, 5/4/10, Peter Brigham MD <pmbrig at gmail.com> wrote:

> From: Peter Brigham MD <pmbrig at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: Changing the Style of Words in Field And Quotation Marks?
> To: "How to use Revolution" <use-revolution at lists.runrev.com>
> Date: Tuesday, May 4, 2010, 7:51 AM
> Re: quoted text is treated as one
> word,
> 
> On May 3, 2010, at 7:26 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
> 
> > Michael wrote:
> >> Hi: I'm inclined to disagree. I would vote to keep
> the current behavior.  m
> > 
> > I could easily have overlooked some simple reason to
> retain it. How do you use it, generally?
> 
> I'd like to know too, before adding a QC report. What is
> the advantage that you see, apart from the nearly extinct HC
> legacy issue?
> 
> -- Peter
> 
> Peter M. Brigham
> pmbrig at gmail.com
> http://home.comcast.net/~pmbrig
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> use-revolution mailing list
> use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage
> your subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
>