Apples actual response to the Flash issue

[Randall Lee Reetz]

Computers that process meaning won't "work all day to make the world a better place" any more or less than we (or anything else) do.  But systems that know about the things they process have a substantial leg up on systems that don't.  This isn't a complex concept.  The execution of the design of such a system or its starting point is on the other hand very complex.  If you are demanding that I show you how to build a moon rocket out of farm equipment before you will talk about going into space, then sorry buddy, you are simply and obviously only interested in avoiding the topic and or slandering my person.  

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Swindell <mdswindell at cruzio.com>
Sent: Sunday, May 02, 2010 4:11 PM
To: How to use Revolution <use-revolution at lists.runrev.com>
Subject: Re: Apples actual response to the Flash issue

Maybe, but I suspect Randall has some ideas that I'd really like to hear about.  For the life of me, I have a hard time deciphering what they are.  But I'd like to hear about them, in simplest terms, without ambiguity.

Mark


On May 2, 2010, at 4:07 PM, Michael Kann wrote:

> As I read what Randall proposes, you won't "sit down at a computer." The computer will have enough knowledge of the world to work full-time making the world a better place. Every so often it will sit down with a human to explain what it has discovered and what the human can do to help. 
> 
> 
> --- On Sun, 5/2/10, Mark Swindell <mdswindell at cruzio.com> wrote:
> 
>> From: Mark Swindell <mdswindell at cruzio.com>
>> Subject: Re: Apples actual response to the Flash issue
>> To: "How to use Revolution" <use-revolution at lists.runrev.com>
>> Date: Sunday, May 2, 2010, 5:58 PM
>> Randall,
>> 
>> What do you want to see software do?  Please be



[The entire original message is not included]