Apples actual response to the Flash issue

Randall Lee Reetz randall at randallreetz.com
Mon May 3 01:16:24 CDT 2010


I guess if a person is sufficiently ignorant or has their fingers in their ears and screams, any honest answer will slip by un recognized.  Would you like it better if I said the future of computing is better touch up tools in photo editors?  In the nixon administration your rhetorical technique was called "rat f___ing" and was used as you are to thwart opponents who would win legitimate and fair debates or elections.  Tell me your great vision of computation or at the very least why you are so threatened by me. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Randall Lee Reetz <randall at randallreetz.com>
Sent: Sunday, May 02, 2010 10:23 PM
To: How to use Revolution <use-revolution at lists.runrev.com>
Subject: RE: Apples actual response to the Flash issue

Are you closer to understanding entropy and the  evolution of complexity now?

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Swindell <mdswindell at cruzio.com>
Sent: Sunday, May 02, 2010 7:17 PM
To: How to use Revolution <use-revolution at lists.runrev.com>
Subject: Re: Apples actual response to the Flash issue

Randall,

Like most people, I'm neither Galileo nor the Church.  I sign my real name to my posts, and I asked you a real question hoping for a real answer... a simple, honest question about your vision for computing, to which you have no answer, only more masturbatory rhetoric, and the same name calling and juvenile inferences that only a few posts ago you so decried when it came your way.  So, unless you wish to become honest and stop hiding inside your linguistic psychedelics, I give up.  I'm not sure at this point that you'd recognize truth or honesty if it hit you upside the head with a two-by-four. 

Mark

On May 2, 2010, at 5:56 PM, Randall Lee Reetz wrote:

> Sad.  Truth matters in all affairs.  Good people can see through lies and


[The entire original message is not included]



More information about the use-livecode mailing list