Apples actual response to the Flash issue

[Randall Lee Reetz]

Not only do I believe this is happening, I am building (or attempting to build) a seed sufficient to evolve towards its eventuality.

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Kann <mikekann at yahoo.com>
Sent: Sunday, May 02, 2010 4:13 PM
To: How to use Revolution <use-revolution at lists.runrev.com>
Subject: Re: Apples actual response to the Flash issue

Mark, I wasn't trying to be funny. I really think that scenario is what Randall envisions. 

Mike

--- On Sun, 5/2/10, Mark Swindell <mdswindell at cruzio.com> wrote:

> From: Mark Swindell <mdswindell at cruzio.com>
> Subject: Re: Apples actual response to the Flash issue
> To: "How to use Revolution" <use-revolution at lists.runrev.com>
> Date: Sunday, May 2, 2010, 6:11 PM
> Maybe, but I suspect Randall has some
> ideas that I'd really like to hear about.  For the life
> of me, I have a hard time deciphering what they are. 
> But I'd like to hear about them, in simplest terms, without
> ambiguity.
> 
> Mark
> 
> 
> On May 2, 2010, at 4:07 PM, Michael Kann wrote:
> 
> > As I read what Randall proposes, you won't "sit down
> at a computer." The computer will have enough knowledge of
> the world to work full-time making the world a better place.
> Every so often it will sit down with a human to explain what
> it has discovered and what the human can do to help. 
> > 
> > 
> > --- On Sun, 5/2/10, Mark Swindell <mdswindell at cruzio.com>
> wrote:
> > 
> >> From: Mark Swindell <mdswindell at cruzio.com>
> >> Subject: Re: Apples actual response to the Flash
> issue
> >> To: "How to use Revolution" <use-revolution at lists.runrev.com>
> >> Date: Sunday, May 2, 2010, 5:58 PM
> >> Randall,
> >> 
> >> What do you want to see software do?  Please
> be
> >> succinct.  Give a handful of examples of what
> you
> >> envision happening when you sit down at a
> computer. 
> >> Real terms.  No philosophy.  I'm not
> trying to
> >> disrespect you here, I just don't fully comprehend
> what your
> >> vision is for software, and how that will make the
> computing
> >> world (and world) a better place.
> >> 
> >> Thanks,
> >> Mark
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> On May 2, 2010, at 3:36 PM, Randall Lee Reetz
> wrote:
> >> 
> >>> Ok, but


[The entire original message is not included]