Apples actual response to the Flash issue

Ian Wood revlist at
Sun May 2 15:32:12 EDT 2010

On 2 May 2010, at 20:13, Randall Lee Reetz wrote:

> So, how about some content?  A substantive rebuttal?  Putting your  
> ideas out there for all to see?

How about replying to direct questions asked of you, for instance why  
facial recognition is revolutionary but content-aware fill isn't? Or  
why the examples of things facial recognition is being used for *now*  
in consumer products is 'Almost nothing'.

It would also be useful if you could explain what you mean by  
revisionist applications. I *assume* you are talking about apps that  
are evolutionary rather than revolutionary in how they change what  
people do with them, but it's not clear and 'revisionist' has some  
very specific connotations.


More information about the Use-livecode mailing list