Apples actual response to the Flash issue

Richmond Mathewson richmondmathewson at
Sun May 2 15:17:47 EDT 2010

  On 02/05/2010 22:13, Randall Lee Reetz wrote:
> Personal attacks again?  Really, you need to substitute that 7 year old crap for a genuine statement of content?  And you don't think people see it for what it is?  Is it because the teacher left the room?  Is that the level of morality you have achieved?  So, how about some content?  A substantive rebuttal?  Putting your ideas out there for all to see?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David C.<davidocoker at>
> Sent: Sunday, May 02, 2010 11:15 AM
> To: How to use Revolution<use-revolution at>
> Subject: Re: Apples actual response to the Flash issue
>> The only reason I'm even reading this thread is I, too, out of
>> the blue, received off-list messages regarding your incite full
>> posts. And, I feel humbled in the presence of the only
>> visionary thinker in the world with regard to software.
> I typically avoid participation in threads like this, but I just have
> to this time around...
> Outside of the "knee deep in B.S." factor, I find it a bit unusual for
> such to be spewed forth from a "visionary" who's web site currently
> has the following content:
> rhetoric - under construction
> ideas - under construction
> future - under construction
> ...a tad bit of food for thought.
> Regards,
> David C.

Thanks, David, for pointing the way to Randall's website; I enjoyed my 
visit there,
and I am sure many other people would. I found it helped to 
contextualise a lot
what Randall writes about.

More information about the Use-livecode mailing list