OT: Parallels or VMWare Fusion?
andre at andregarzia.com
Fri Feb 19 09:00:14 EST 2010
Smaller processor's time needs means it doesn't lock the computer all
time like parallels used to?
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Pierre Sahores <psahores at free.fr> wrote:
> Same here after a direct switch from Parallels 3.0 to Virtual Box, because
> its smallest processor's time needs and because it never crashes ;-)
> Le 19 févr. 10 à 14:32, Andre Garzia a écrit :
>> I've used Parallels, VMWare Fusion and Virtual Box, in that order,
>> now, I use only virtual box even as I've paid for Fusion 1.0 and
>> Parallels from 1.0 to 3.0.
> Best Regards,
> Pierre Sahores
> mobile : (33) 6 03 95 77 70
> use-revolution mailing list
> use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
http://www.andregarzia.com All We Do Is Code.
More information about the Use-livecode