OT: Parallels or VMWare Fusion?

Andre Garzia andre at andregarzia.com
Fri Feb 19 07:32:02 CST 2010

I've used Parallels, VMWare Fusion and Virtual Box, in that order,
now, I use only virtual box even as I've paid for Fusion 1.0 and
Parallels from 1.0 to 3.0.

One good thing I like in virtualbox is that I have it on my mac and on
my linux machines, so I can test things on my macbook or fat pc and
keep working on the other machine. Also the FREE part is appealing.


On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 9:29 AM, Bernard Devlin <bdrunrev at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 10:50 PM,  <runrev260805 at m-r-d.de> wrote:
> i am in the process of switching  from Windows to Mac.Not really
> switching, but i want to develop on Mac OS X.  As i am using some
> tools, which are not available for Mac, i need to run a virtual
> machine also on my mac. On my windows machines i am running several
> virtual machines on VmWare Workstation and i am really satisfied with
> it.
> <<<
> There's one other option. QEMU and it's free.  I dismissed this for a
> long time, but after I'd had problems with both VMWare and VirtualBox
> (both of which I otherwise liked) I tried QEMU.  It appears that QEMU
> is the basis for VirtualBox and for the XEN hypervisor, i.e. they are
> some fork of QEMU.
> Bernard
> _______________________________________________
> use-revolution mailing list
> use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

http://www.andregarzia.com All We Do Is Code.

More information about the use-livecode mailing list