Why are locking size and position treated as one?

[Devin Asay]

On Feb 5, 2010, at 8:35 AM, Mark Swindell wrote:

> I asked this a couple of days ago and got no response so I thought  
> I'd try again.
>
> Why are locking size and position of an image inextricably linked?   
> They seem to me to be two separate entities.  I know how to get  
> around the situation via script, but I don't know why there should  
> be the inconvenience of having to "get around" anything.  Is there a  
> good reason for this or is it just a legacy reality that could be  
> changed?  Why not be able to drag an image around whose size is  
> constrained?

Mark,

There is a long-standing enhancement request on this:

http://quality.runrev.com/qacenter/show_bug.cgi?id=2242

Regards,

Devin

Devin Asay
Humanities Technology and Research Support Center
Brigham Young University