Why are locking size and position treated as one?
andre at andregarzia.com
Fri Feb 5 12:26:55 EST 2010
very good question, I have no answer.
You can fake your locks with script if you want to decouple them.
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 1:35 PM, Mark Swindell <mdswindell at cruzio.com> wrote:
> I asked this a couple of days ago and got no response so I thought I'd try
> Why are locking size and position of an image inextricably linked? They
> seem to me to be two separate entities. I know how to get around the
> situation via script, but I don't know why there should be the inconvenience
> of having to "get around" anything. Is there a good reason for this or is
> it just a legacy reality that could be changed? Why not be able to drag an
> image around whose size is constrained?
> use-revolution mailing list
> use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> subscription preferences:
http://www.andregarzia.com All We Do Is Code.
More information about the Use-livecode