One day to go . . .

[Richmond Mathewson]

Peter W A Wood wrote:
> Richmond
>
>> Ideally I would like, eventually, to  have a successful, web-based 
>> client so that
>> end-users can "do their Sanskrit" without having to clutter up their 
>> hard disks
>> (or their employers) with a standalone.
>
> Is a stand-alone really that much more clutter than the plug-in and 
> the revlet? Surely, they're about the same size, just stored in 
> different places on the users' hard disks.
>
A very good point.  The only disadvantage about the latter is that the 
end-user
actually has to download the standalone and decide where to put it and
generally spend more time on "meta" things.