One day to go . . .
richmondmathewson at gmail.com
Wed Nov 11 04:17:43 CST 2009
Peter W A Wood wrote:
>> Ideally I would like, eventually, to have a successful, web-based
>> client so that
>> end-users can "do their Sanskrit" without having to clutter up their
>> hard disks
>> (or their employers) with a standalone.
> Is a stand-alone really that much more clutter than the plug-in and
> the revlet? Surely, they're about the same size, just stored in
> different places on the users' hard disks.
A very good point. The only disadvantage about the latter is that the
actually has to download the standalone and decide where to put it and
generally spend more time on "meta" things.
More information about the use-livecode