help - why is this no work?!

[Mark Schonewille]

Right, Sean, and I believe there is a *plan* to make "char" really  
refer to a character.

--
Best regards,

Mark Schonewille

Economy-x-Talk Consulting and Software Engineering
http://economy-x-talk.com
http://www.salery.biz
Dutch forum: http://runrev.info/rrforum

New: Snapper Screen Recorder 2.0.1
Download at http://snapper.economy-x-talk.com

On 14 mei 2009, at 16:01, Shao Sean wrote:

> I guess for the move towards better built-in unicode support they  
> have added in the following features
>
> byte (currently the same as character)
> byteToNum = charToNum
> numToByte = numToChar
>
> If I remember correctly a byte will be a byte and a char can be a  
> byte, or two bytes or three bytes depending on the character..