answer as sheet showing on wrong stack

[Richmond Mathewson]

Sorry, but I am part of the revolution (if, admittedly, only the
boy who throws eggs at the Tsar) as I am signed, and paid-up for the
conference, and so, in line to receive "4"; meanwhile, tootling around
with 2.6.1 I am, of necessity, confined to the old revOnline.

Of course, anybody who stopped a minute and thought, would
have kept old versions of RR for "magical moments" such as these.

I have RR 1 - 2.0.1 tucked away for various reasons; and from time
to time they all prove useful.

Kay C Lan wrote:
> On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Richmond Mathewson <
> richmondmathewson at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>   
>> So, the proable reason no one found my "QUESTION.rev" stack is that nobody
>> wanted to type a taboo name.  :)
>>
>>     
>
> I believe the real reason is that you uploaded your stack to the OLD
> RevOnline whilst those that did the searching did it on the NEW RevOnline.
>
> Not only has the RevOnline interface been vastly updated in 3.5 but my
> understanding is that the whole back-end is new too. Nothing on the OLD
> RevOnline exists on the NEW RevOnline unless individuals have intentionally
> uploaded their old content using Rev 3.5 to get it onto the NEW RevOnline.
>
> Rev 3.5 can't upload or look into the OLD RevOnline and Rev 3.0 or earlier
> can't upload or look into the NEW RevOnline.
>
> I may be wrong, but it's what you get for being part of the revolution ;-)
> _______________________________________________
> use-revolution mailing list
> use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
>
>