"ss" function

[Ben Rubinstein]

DunbarX at aol.com wrote:
> I don't know if I will pursue this. Having all instances of a string in a 
> list is MUCH better than hitting them sequentially. There are a few modifications 
> I might suggest to the way the "find and Replace" dialog is accessed, and how 
> the find string is loaded, but right now I think it is a better tool than 
> HC's.
> 
> For example, unless I missed it (again), you have to have all tabs already 
> open to search all scripts in a stack. This can be a pain; HC at least went 
> through everything (there should be a third option in that menu, named "whole 
> stack"). 

Yes - that's what I've requested here:
http://quality.runrev.com/qacenter/show_bug.cgi?id=7321

Please take a look, and add your comments/votes about how you think this 
should work.

> And I think the way the dialog loads the string to search for can be 
> improved, for example, if the dialog is already open, you cannot just select a 
> string in an existing script and hit Cmd-Shift-F to load that new string. You 
> have to either type it in or close the dialog and invoke the shortcut.

Also a good idea - please put it in QC!

- Ben (who's just realised his earlier post on this had the 'mousecontrol' 
subject line, although it was really about 'ss')