Rev 4 beta status

[Richmond Mathewson]

"???? 7 July" was not sent in a "hey you slack lot, stir your stumps"
kind of way, but just a gentle sort of "keep us posted, Please" sort
of way. If Marian and Colin can't tell the difference between
aggressive and friendly question marks I really don't know what
to say, except, possibly: !!!!!    :)


Marian Petrides wrote:
> OK, gang.  I'm as eager as the rest of you, but how about we cut the 
> RunRev team a little slack here.  Personally, I'd prefer to get a beta 
> without known problems rather than a beta on-time that will need 
> replacement in a day or two because there are known problems that 
> couldn't get addressed prior to release.
>
> My 2 cents.
>
> Marian
> On Jul 7, 2009, at 9:17 AM, Colin Holgate wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jul 7, 2009, at 6:23 AM, Richmond Mathewson wrote:
>>
>>> ???? 7 July
>>
>> Up to the end of today would still be "early next week". After that 
>> it becomes "middle of next week". But I suppose it's best to have a 
>> version that runs ok!
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> use-revolution mailing list
>> use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
>> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your 
>> subscription preferences:
>> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
>
> _______________________________________________
> use-revolution mailing list
> use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your 
> subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
>