Inefficient code - Solutions

[BNig]

Bill Marriott wrote:
> 
> Bernd,
> 
> Actually in my testing on my machines, over about 20 tests, your change
> ends 
> up being slightly slower by about 1%, depending on the images :) ...
> It's interesting how the timed duration can change from one execution to
> the 
> next.

I tested about, well 10 times each when concluding that the version I posted
was a little faster. When testing again it was slower, as you noticed. So no
dice with this version :)

Again thank you for this challenge and the code.

regards

Bernd

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Inefficient-code-tp24226458p24286092.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.