tbandi at swissonline.ch
Fri Dec 4 17:07:57 EST 2009
The bibliography is still missing (if I did not overlook something).
Am 04.12.2009 um 17:23 schrieb Kevin Miller:
> On 04/12/2009 10:57, "viktoras d." <viktoras at ekoinf.net> wrote:
>> what about using task/code examples from
>> http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/. Revcoders (us, runrev ltd?..) will
>> still have to write quality examples in Rev which would be a challenge
>> :-) Quality of the code there is good enough as computer language
>> benchmarks game aims to create the shortest and fastest running
>> executables for all the open source languages out there. So both number
>> of lines, speed of execution and memory use are taken into account..
>> I think for the community of revcoders it would be interesting to
>> compare revTalk in that context too :-).
> I think that's a great idea.
> Obviously there are a number of ways to tackle this problem and we will
> continue to work on holding a clear and informed debate over the coming
> weeks. Thanks to everyone who has made suggestions.
> For the moment we have updated the comparison at
> http://www.runrev.com/pdf/revTalk-Other-Comparison.pdf to better articulate
> the point that was intended. We will post a similar discussion and add some
> We will continue to work on finding good ways to realistically and clearly
> make the case for revTalk. It is very good news that there is now a debate
> going on.
> Kind regards,
> Kevin Miller ~ kevin at runrev.com ~ http://www.runrev.com/
> RunRev - Software construction for everyone
> use-revolution mailing list
> use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences:
More information about the Use-livecode