Syllabic division of words

[Randall Reetz]

I am never sarcastic.  These functions can be written upon a meta-grammatical base that will work across languages.  Rev already does this in limited ways.  I find these limits absurd and backwards.  Provencial even.  It is long past time to ask the big questions of computing as a field.  We follow as sheep, even when we are in charge of computing's future.

randall

-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Cragg <dave.cragg at lacscentre.co.uk>
Sent: Friday, August 21, 2009 12:08 PM
To: How to use Revolution <use-revolution at lists.runrev.com>
Subject: Re: Syllabic division of words


On 21 Aug 2009, at 19:16, Randall Reetz wrote:

> In addition to syllables, the system should be able to identify the  
> following textual chunks:
> Characters
> Phonems
> Words
> Parts of speech (phrases)
> subject/object
> Semantic roots
> Sentences
> Paragraphs
> Sections
> Volumes
> Sets
> Lists
> Multidimentional arrays and nested tables
> Unlimited nested and overlapping hyperlinks and transclussions
> Tempo, pausing, pitch, volume, and percussive contrast
> Ontological association network mapping between any chunk or chunk  
> type
>
> A simple, intuitive and robust interface and functional library to  
> address and effect these objects at every hierarchy of the  
> grammatical stack.

Would this be for Polish or just Chinese?

Sorry, but I can't work out if you're being serious or plain sarcastic  
like myself.

Dave




_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution