Transcript should be called Transcript

[Ben Rubinstein]

My biggest priority for a new name is that it should be a sufficiently good 
choice to avoid being changed again.   We've been through MetaTalk -> 
Transcript -> Revolution -> (new name);   Each time the name is changed, a 
whole lot of efforts to raising awareness is lost, and useful information 
becomes further fragmented and hard to find.  Personally I never took any 
notice of the last change and continued to refer to the language as 
Revolution.  No doubt some still refer to it as MetaTalk.

My second biggest priority for a name is that it be unique and hence 
searchable.  Revolution and Transcript both failed that test.  If Transcript 
hadn't, I'd have argued more strongly for going back to it in accordance with 
the above.  RevTalk meets that test.

The context for the new name is that RunRev are renaming all their products to 
clarify them, and I think that's a good thing.  By renaming them all to unique 
compound pseudo words, they also become more searchable: ie "revStudio" is 
better than "Revolution Studio".  My remaining concern is that it would be 
better if the language name was orthoganal to, rather than in line with, the 
various product names:
	revMedia
	revStudio
	revEnterprise
	revWeb

	revlets
	revTalk
	RevSelect *

	RunRev *

RunRev is easy to see as something that goes across all the above.  In an 
ideal world (ie, one in which I am in charge of everything) revTalk would be 
more distinguished - actually I'd have suggested reversing all the others to 
mediaRev, studioRev etc) rather than looking like it's one among the set.

Beyond these three concerns, while I have minor views and preferences among 
revCode, revScript, revTalk etc, I think that's the least important aspect of 
the name.

But it's all moot anyway: RunRev have launched a new name, "revTalk".  That's 
what it is now.

Ben

* capitalisation of these elements is less obviously fixed, at least in the 
current iteration of the RunRev (or runrev) website.