Rev 3.5 Dictionary--User contributed notes!

[Richard Gaskin]

Devin wrote:
> In the case of Dictionary comments, there could be a third way. What  
> if Rev allowed volunteers in the developer community to get "checked- 
> out" in evaluating the quality of submissions. Once qualified, these  
> volunteer editors could simply review submissions as they popped up,  
> evaluate them on the spot according to RunRev's guidelines, and  
> approve them. Result: time burden off the engineering team, high- 
> quality comments ensured. I wouldn't mind spending a few minutes a day  
> checking submissions. I know there are experienced folks here who,  
> based on the quality of there contributions to the list, could do an  
> excellent job in this role.

Excellent idea! Truly best of both worlds, since it helps expedite 
approvals without requiring additional resources at RunRev.

-- 
  Richard Gaskin
  Fourth World
  Revolution training and consulting: http://www.fourthworld.com
  Webzine for Rev developers: http://www.revjournal.com