Stack Overflow : a new site for programming Q&A.

[Paul Looney]

My first thought, years ago, was "revTalk" also.
But  "talks" are not preceived as "real" languages - remember when  
Apple went through all those contortions to use "scripting" instead  
of "coding". Dropping "talk" helps Rev transcend its heritage and  
paradigm - will result in more sales, too.
Paul Looney

On Sep 23, 2008, at 8:15 AM, Richard Gaskin wrote:

> Mikey wrote:
>> I liked RevCode originally, but I think, to be true to the paradigm,
>> revTalk is probably better, because it is clearer which dialect we're
>> referring to.
>
> I generally avoid "me too" posts, but this is the first time I can
> recall "RevTalk" being mentioned here, and I like it for the same
> reasons:  it's short, cannot be misspelled or mispronounced, and
> clarifies its heritage.
>
> -- 
>  Richard Gaskin
>  Managing Editor, revJournal
>  _______________________________________________________
>  Rev tips, tutorials and more: http://www.revJournal.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> use-revolution mailing list
> use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your  
> subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution