Why I didn't, and why I may, later.

[Bernard Devlin]

Before anyone else jumps in.  Richmond, it seems I'm the only one having
issues with 2.9 and 3.0.

It might be useful for you to download the evaluation versions (particularly
if you are using Linux), to see if the product is buggy for you.  If not,
you've got a good reason to fill the jar asap.

Bernard

On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 11:04 AM, Richmond Mathewson <geradamas at yahoo.com>wrote:

> 1. A bit short of money right now.
>
> 2. For reasons that have been confirmed in the Use-List since RR 3 was
> released: the very same reason why I bought a Mac G4 two weeks after they
> released the G5s.
>
> Microsoft and Apple have been slammed time and time again for releasing
> software (operating systems or other) which still looks Beta-ish. There is a
> school of thought that Mac OS X is still a bit tatty round the edges (v.g.
> the inconsistencies that abound in the behaviour of the Finder).
> Probably why quite a lot of people with PPC Macs feel cheesed-off about
> being excluded from 10.6.
>
> There are folk who will claim that firms release Beta-ish software to raise
> money to continue work; this has always struck me as a bit disingenuous.
>
> Hundreds of people who bought themselves PCs with "Vista" installed are
> returning to XP because the view is a bit foggy.
>
> I am now popping pennies (quite literally) in a jam jar with "3.x" written
> on it.
>
> sincerely, Richmond Mathewson.
> ____________________________________________________________
>
> A Thorn in the flesh is better than a failed Systems Development Life
> Cycle.
> ____________________________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> use-revolution mailing list
> use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
>