On-line error parsing tool

[Richard Gaskin]

Mark Schonewille wrote:
> If the handler DoX actually had not existed, the list of errors would  
> have ended at your line 5. Since it exists...

Right.  That's the mystery:  the handler does exist, and the erroneous 
error code is the only unique element in that line.  The other parts of 
that line are all redundant information provided on other lines.

So why does the engine insist on including an erroneous and redundant 
entry along with all the truly useful stuff in its error info?

This is one of those times when I'd like to be able to pour Scott Raney 
a tall one, sit back and ask him, "What were you thinking?"  :)

-- 
  Richard Gaskin
  Managing Editor, revJournal
  _______________________________________________________
  Rev tips, tutorials and more: http://www.revJournal.com