Delete a stack from memory - fails?
J. Landman Gay
jacque at hyperactivesw.com
Tue Jul 29 13:25:31 CDT 2008
Trevor DeVore wrote:
> On Jul 29, 2008, at 2:03 PM, Trevor DeVore wrote:
>> On Jul 29, 2008, at 1:44 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
>>> Trevor DeVore wrote:
>>>> Polling is entirely possible. delete stack is very reliable. Like I
>>>> said, I've never had it fail. When it *appears* to fail it is
>>>> usually because something is going on in the background that brings
>>>> the stack right back into memory.
>>> If the stack has any pending messages running it also won't close.
> Oh wait, do you mean that a handler that was calling with send in time
> is executing at the time you issue 'delete stack'?
No, you're right, it closes and is removed. What I was thinking is that
since pending messages prevent quitting, they also prevent closing --
but they don't. So scratch that. Like you, I've always found "delete
stack" to be reliable.
Jacqueline Landman Gay | jacque at hyperactivesw.com
HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
More information about the use-livecode