[off]VMWare vs. Parallels

[Randall Lee Reetz]

More to my point, VMWare is doing deeply hardware kinds of things in software (that is the hint i would drop to the rev development team if i was a hint dropper).  I doubt if it would profit rev to dig this deep into general processing land, but there do seem to be alternative paths (to OS specific run time engines).  Something in this tilestack project really points forward.  Think of a future for OS's where there presentation and interaction layers translate out to a universal format like postscript, flash, or java or some sooped up version of xml or an executable uml.  The OS slaves to a deeper universal.

-----Original Message-----
From: "Mikey" <mikeythek at gmail.com>
To: "How to use Revolution" <use-revolution at lists.runrev.com>
Sent: 1/18/2008 11:48 AM
Subject: [off]VMWare vs. Parallels

I know the reviews of Parallels have been that the speed is impressive
- as long as VMWare was just brought up, has anybody tried it vs.
Parallels and done a performance comparison?  Sometime in the next
year I'm going to be replacing my HP laptop.  It would be nice to get
a Mac notebook, since all of the Macs on my desk are a little older,
but I'm going to have to figure out how to continue to run my Windoze
software, too.
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution