The Documentation

[Mark Swindell]

I feel that the document structure Bjornke and Andre have crafted  
offers the best of both worlds.

It makes use of the official docs while integrating what is  
functionally an editable, wiki-like user interface for user  
extensions, clarifications, and examples.  Web-based Wikis can't  
match the form or function.  Clearly the interface could improve  
cosmetically and even functionally, I guess (there's always room for  
improvement).  But it's a great model.

Mark

On Oct 18, 2007, at 2:53 AM, Richmond Mathewson wrote:

> Timothy Miller wrote:
>
> "Docs too terse. Experienced users comprehend. Others
> struggle."
>
> Many people have accused me of prolixity; never the
> reverse :)
>
> I am perfectly happy to supply the password for the
> wiki to those who e-mail me off list and have
> recognisable names - don't really want the wiki full
> of pictures of people's anatomy or silly adverts for
> v*^gr$.
>
> sincerely, Richmond Mathewson
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
>
> A Thorn in the flesh is better than a failed Systems Development  
> Life Cycle.
> ____________________________________________________________
>
>
>       ___________________________________________________________
> Yahoo! Answers - Got a question? Someone out there knows the  
> answer. Try it
> now.
> http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/
> _______________________________________________
> use-revolution mailing list
> use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your  
> subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
>

-Mark