Revolution => Flash
Luis
luis at anachreon.co.uk
Fri Oct 12 17:10:56 EDT 2007
What about a Rev cgi running the Rev web UI? It shouldn't need
translation to JavaScript. And the Rev web UI: From what I've seen the
cards are XML. I've given some time to try to translate these but didn't
bother after a while.
Cheers,
Luis.
Andre Garzia wrote:
> Hello Friends,
> Again we touch the topic of revolution, plugins, flash and the web. This
> topic always appear, not because we're stubborn but because it is hot and
> current. I'll not repeat all things the other mails said but will try to
> propose a simple solution that can be attained now with the resources we
> have, it just take a group of developers engaged to make this happen.
>
> Exporting from Rev to Flash or Java is not feasible because it ties Rev to a
> third party product that can take directions that completelly break rev
> compatibility. Creating such exporter would require a new engine that would
> run inside the flash or java plugin or it would require a translator that
> would convert revolution logic to actionscript or java. This poses a problem
> since the three languages have unique features. It's not that it can't be
> done, it's that it is not worth being done.
>
> What people appear to want here is something that would enable them to build
> AJAX application with Revolution. Create the next 37signals or something
> like that. Nothing is stopping anyone here from building Revolution based
> web applications, the problem is that one of the biggest advantages of Rev
> is lost when building web application, which is the presentation layer.
> Revolution UI elements are not transferable to the web. So even as if we can
> code in transcript our web application, we can't build the interface in Rev,
> we need another set of skills like css, javascript, html to build the UI.
>
> So in the end the problem is very simple, our only problem is: "how do we
> map revolution UI to the Web?", if we could map this, then a pure transcript
> solution for converting stacks to the web would be born in a couple thousand
> lines.
>
> Every web application is divided in the following components: UI, UI logic,
> Server Side Logic. The UI logic makes the connection between the UI layer
> and the server side components. This is a variation of the MVC paradigm also
> called model2 by Sun. We can already create the server side logic, we need
> to create tools to work out the UI and UI Logic component.
>
> The User interface is mostly HTML + CSS + some javascript in some cases
> (rollover and animation effects). The UI logic is pure javascript (XHR calls
> and the like). I know we all love Transcript but allow me to say that
> Javascript is a very nice language supporting some very nice features. It's
> actually pleasant to code in javascript once you know. The thing is that Rev
> coder should not be forced to learn javascript or at least that Rev could
> create basic javascript for the developer so that the end job is just a
> fine tuning one (like ruby on rails skeletons).
>
> To programatically convert UI logic and UI components from Rev to the web is
> not an easy task. The models are completely different.
>
> Rev -> Stacks, Cards, Groups, Objects. Most based on fields and buttons.
> Web -> The DOM, CSS, nested nature of HTML. Most based on text and images.
>
> Mapping from Rev to the Web is a daunting task, for example, how do you map
> "go next card" to the web, what should happen? go to a new page? display a
> hidden div?
>
> What we need is a new tools palette with WEB ELEMENTS and a converter
> plugin. This plugin would know how to convert those elements to the web.
> Then Revolution becomes like Apple Interface Builder, you have a set of
> palettes to build an interface that can be accessed later by your web
> application. Instead of trying to convert a stack app to the web, we begin
> from the start building a web application using web safe elements and web
> safe code. This can be created inside revolution right now, it just take
> time and effort.
>
> This web safe environment would have conventions like "stack script" goes to
> server side component, "card script" goes to UI Logic component. The stack
> controls disposition is converted to CSS using absolute positioning. We
> don't even need the build-upload-debug cycle, we can keep testing all this
> at runtime by a combination of RevBrowser and RevHTTP inside the IDE.
>
> This is easier shown than explained. I'll build something to show in the
> next two days...
> andre
> _______________________________________________
> use-revolution mailing list
> use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
>
>
More information about the use-livecode
mailing list