AW: Quicktime and Encoder

[Tiemo Hollmann TB]

Thanks Henk and Stephen
Actually file size doesen't not matter, but I don't have to watch for the
last bytes ;)
Tiemo

> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: use-revolution-bounces at lists.runrev.com [mailto:use-revolution-
> bounces at lists.runrev.com] Im Auftrag von Henk van der Velden
> Gesendet: Montag, 19. November 2007 19:32
> An: use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
> Betreff: Re: Quicktime and Encoder
> 
> On 19-nov-2007, at 19:00, use-revolution-request at lists.runrev.com wrote:
> 
> >
> >> 2. Has anybody a personal quality comparison between the Sorenson
> >> 3 codec
> >> and the new H.264? Is H.264 actually now the "state of the art"?
> >> Which codec
> >> is the best quality choice in your eyes for offline content, no
> >> streaming,
> >> not worrying of the file size?
> >
> > Sorry, no idea :-)
> If file size really doesn't matter, then why compress at all? Use DV-
> PAL or the like..
> >
> >>
> >> 5. If you use a flash codec in a mov file. Has the output the same
> >> quality
> >> as a native flash movie? - In your personal experience
> >
> > No experience, sorry.
> I'm no expert on flash video, but I seem to remember that Flash
> initially used the Cinepak codec, and now also supports the H.264
> codec. But QT can't play Flash movies. QT supports Flash files only
> up to Flash 5 and Flash 5 only had very poor support of video.
> _______________________________________________
> use-revolution mailing list
> use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution