Clause in the Valentina License
Luis
luis at anachreon.co.uk
Sat May 5 18:53:10 EDT 2007
That's the reason why I went for PostrgreSQL for Mac: http://
www.postgresqlformac.com/
OpenBase Solo (their free version, 5 user methinks) was extremely
tempting, but I had already started on PostgreSQL: www.openbase.com
Cheers,
Luis.
On 5 May 2007, at 20:31, Peter Alcibiades wrote:
> Years ago at a now forgotten company a whimsical older manager was
> starting up
> a first class on databases. What, he asked, is the most important
> thing to
> consider when inputting data into an application?
>
> We young fellows stumbled around for a while, as you can imagine.
> Finally he
> delivered himself of his accumulated wisdom, which has remained
> with me ever
> since. "Never key any information into an application without
> knowing how
> you are going to get it out".
>
>
> If what the clause is saying is, you the developer may not use the
> embedded
> kit to create and sell a database engine + ide, a product in
> itself, that
> competes with Valentina, that seems entirely reasonable. It is
> exactly the
> problem Rev might have had if there were a cut down version of
> Studio, and a
> cheap or free player - effectively, you'd be letting loose a more
> or less
> equivalent version of the product for very little or no revenue.
> No one
> could reasonably demand that you do that. And given a choice, is
> the world
> better off with cheap versions, or with none (which in the end is the
> consequence of your being unable to restrict use in this way) most
> of us
> would say, better the cheap version with some restrictions.
>
> But if what is being said is that once an end user has put his
> stuff in, you
> the developer may not use the kit to extract that data in a form
> which he can
> use in some other competing database, well, no thanks. We need to
> get our
> priorities straight: its his data. Don't tell him what to do with
> it.
>
> I was alerted to this by an organization who had keyed in several
> person-years
> work of their own intellectual property into a database with no export
> provisions. When they wanted to get it out, the reply was, good
> luck writing
> your own programs, or pay us generously to do it. Whose intellectual
> property was it? We had no doubt, but there seemed to be some
> confusion in
> the mind of the application supplier.
>
> Post sale restrictions on use, in the EU, are unrelated to
> copyright. You
> cannot make derivative works, which are typically copyright
> violations,
> without approval of the holder. That is quite different from post
> sales
> restrictions on use, which attempt to prevent you from using the
> purchased
> property in certain ways which are legally unobjectionable.
>
> The reason why I cannot put images derived from the DVD on a T
> shirt without
> permission is copyright. The reason why Sony cannot forbid me from
> using the
> player in any way I want after I've bought it, is that post sale
> restrictions
> on use are unenforceable in the EU. But this does not mean I can
> use it to
> violate copyright. That's an independent matter.
>
> Take a tool - a plane or chisel for example. A supplier cannot
> make two
> versions, a professional one and a DIY one, and solely by
> conditions on
> purchase, forbid professional carpenters from using the DIY one for
> purposes
> of trade. Once people have bought things you can't tell them how
> to use
> them. You can void their warranty. You can exempt yourself from
> damages due
> to injury. But you can't stop them. I have often wondered
> doubtrfully
> whether, when Filemaker sells an academic version of Filemaker
> Advanced in
> the EU, and forbids the buyer to sell works made with it, that
> would hold up
> in court if challenged by some enterprising university or charity.
> It would
> perhaps be wise of both supplier and buyer not to insist on finding
> out.
>
>
> Peter
> _______________________________________________
> use-revolution mailing list
> use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
>
More information about the use-livecode
mailing list