What's wrong with Globals?
Richard Gaskin
ambassador at fourthworld.com
Fri Mar 30 20:04:31 EDT 2007
Jim Ault wrote:
> Basically, globals are all owned by Rev, which means you can close a stack
> and remove it from memory, but not the globals. You need to delete the
> global or quit and relaunch Rev.
>
> Globals can be modified by any handler in any stack, even the Rev
> environment (all that stuff behind the scenes).
>
> Globals are not saved with the stack, custom properies can be, but this may
> not be an issue in most cases.
Those also sound like benefits to me. :)
Of course it depends on the context.
I tend to use persistent storage (custom properties) when I need
persistence, and non-persistent storage (globals) whenever I don't.
Both are very useful.
--
Richard Gaskin
Managing Editor, revJournal
_______________________________________________________
Rev tips, tutorials and more: http://www.revJournal.com
More information about the use-livecode
mailing list