Open Source (was Don't you just wish Rev would do this?)
luis at anachreon.co.uk
Thu Jun 7 05:45:35 CDT 2007
Oh no, we agree on something...
On 7 Jun 2007, at 04:25, Chipp Walters wrote:
> On 6/6/07, Samuel M. Smith <smithsm at samuelsmith.org> wrote:
>> The problem I have with runrev is not open source per se but that
>> with a paid model the incentive
>> is for the developer to release "feature" updates that sound good to
>> justify paying upgrade fees but
>> that for the most part are not nearly as valuable to a developer as
>> maintaining stable quality code.
>> Mature open source on the other hand has the opposite incentive,
>> stable code and only add features that
>> people are willing to invest time in to get so you get a different
>> evolution of features over time.
> use-revolution mailing list
> use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> subscription preferences:
More information about the use-livecode