OpenStack : surprise
eric.miclo at wanadoo.fr
Wed Sep 27 23:47:32 CDT 2006
Le 27 sept. 06 à 23:48, Mark Wieder a écrit :
> I just checked this out in OSX in 2.7.2, 2.7.3. and 2.7.4, and the
> behavior is the same in all versions. But different from the Windows
> test of yesterday.
> Tuesday, September 26, 2006, 7:04:52 PM, I wrote:
>> Double-clicking "First Main Stack.rev" opens that stack, waits two
>> seconds, then hides it and launches the second stack.
> No second stack launch. Seems like a platform difference. It appears
> that double-clicking on Windows is setting the defaultFolder so that
> the launch of the second stack from the script succeeds, while this is
> not taking place on OSX. I'm not sure this is a bug, but I certainly
> didn't expect this difference. At any rate, the openStack handler is
> getting called properly in all cases, since the first stack disappears
> after the requisite two seconds.
I'm not sure it is only a defaultFolder setting, because if I place a
"beep" statement at the beginning of the openStack handler:
- nothing will be played is the "Main First Stack" is double-clicked
in the Finder without Revolution was already launched
- the beep will be played if Revolution was launched first.
>> Opening the first stack from the IDE works similarly except that the
>> second stack does not show up. The difference is that you're calling
>> "go to stack" without either having the stack in memory or setting
>> defaultFolder, so the stack isn't found, and this causes a silent
> This behavior is the same. Note that on either platform, loading the
> second stack into memory first and then launching the first stack will
> produce the desired result in the IDE.
> -Mark Wieder
> mwieder at ahsoftware.net
> use-revolution mailing list
> use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> subscription preferences:
-- My NeXT computer will Be a Mac too! --
More information about the use-livecode