Open Letter to Rev: Quality Is Job #1
wjm at wjm.org
Fri Oct 20 15:16:41 CDT 2006
Normally I'd agree with you, and this is why I tried to specifically address
WHY I don't feel Bugzilla is the appropriate avenue at this point, in my
original post. To oversimplify, I feel end-user bug reporting is good for
helping to track down obscure or difficult-to-pin-down issues -- NOT
addressing core problems that should be obvious with cursory examination.
Sure there's a huge range of things in between, but hopefully you get my
It's moot now, as my trial of 2.7.4 is expired. I'll have to wait-and-see
for the next version.
Like I said, it takes time to file these reports, and my job is NOT to do
free, full-time QA for Rev. Surely as a QA professional you can understand
the value of such work.
Mark Wieder wrote:
> While I agree with you on all these points (all right - I haven't seen
> the application error on quit thing, but I'll grant that YMMV) I do
> have to take issue with this one. The first step in getting some of
> these problems fixed is to write up a report on it. The BZ interface
> is the connection between the users and the rev team. They may look in
> on the list casually now and then, but they do pay attention to the
> bug reports.
More information about the use-livecode