Rev 2.7.4 standalone versions
kray at sonsothunder.com
Sun Oct 1 15:36:03 CDT 2006
On 10/1/06 3:10 PM, "Stgoldberg at aol.com" <Stgoldberg at aol.com> wrote:
> Regarding which of the standalone versions to include in distributing one's
> built applications, please correct me if my logic is wrong here:
> a. I assume that very few Mac users have operating systems that are earlier
> than OS X, so one does not have to be so concerned about distributing for OS 9
> (or Classic).
> b. Many people, though, may have OSX versions less than 3.9, so distributing
> an application in Universal Binary would not help these users, if Universal
> Binary requires OS X.3.9 or higher. One would then have to also include
> PowerPC-only (for all versions of OSX) and Intel-only (for optimal performance
> Intel) versions to reach most users.
> c. Perhaps the ideal way of distributing might be a combination of
> PowerPC-only and Intel-only versions. That should cover all PowerPC versions
> well as Intel. It would not be necessary to include the Universal Binary
> Does this logic make sense?
Certainly. Of course you could just make all three available with notes on
the OS version restrictions... but it's your call!
Sons of Thunder Software
Web site: http://www.sonsothunder.com/
Email: kray at sonsothunder.com
More information about the use-livecode