Revolution vs Visual Basic
Mark Smith
mark at maseurope.net
Thu May 4 09:29:12 EDT 2006
Of course, when I wrote 'Revolution', I meant 'Transcript', but now
Transcript is called Revolution, I can pretend I was right all along!
Best,
Mark
On 4 May 2006, at 13:07, David Burgun wrote:
>
> On 8 Mar 2006, at 14:45, Mark Smith wrote:
>>
>> A little out of my depth in saying this, but I don't think
>> Revolution would be optimal for writing large and complex image
>> manipulation routines, for example.
>>
>> I'll leave it there, as I have no experience of VB, so perhaps
>> others can offer useful comparisons.
>
> I've used a combination of RunRev to run the GUI and a C/C++
> External to do the image processing. This combination works really
> well giving you the ease and speed of implementation in RunRev and
> the speed of C/C++ where it counts.
>
> All the Best
> Dave
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> use-revolution mailing list
> use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
More information about the use-livecode
mailing list