When closed, does a substack whose destroyStack is true remains in memory ?

[André.Bisseret]

Le Tuesday, 28 Mar 2006, à 19:23 Europe/Paris, J. Landman Gay a écrit :

> André.Bisseret wrote:
>
> > I had understood from the Doc that if the subStack has its
> > formatForPrinting set to true,  we must avoid to edit it (dump text 
> in
> > it) ?
>
> You will have to try it because I can't remember now. But I think 
> putting text into a field is okay. What you can't do is edit text 
> after it is already in a field. The IDE does something similar when it 
> sets the formatForPrinting of the templateStack, so it should work. 
> But test it.
OK, for me, this looks like a usefull precision ; I will test it (on PC 
of course :-)
Thanks a lot
André
>
> -- 
> Jacqueline Landman Gay         |     jacque at hyperactivesw.com
> HyperActive Software           |     http://www.hyperactivesw.com
> _______________________________________________
> use-revolution mailing list
> use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your 
> subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
>
>