._ files (was: No OpenStack ..... ! Now Ending !)
Thomas McGrath III
3mcgrath at adelphia.net
Thu Mar 9 12:24:00 EST 2006
What this article doesn't say is what happens if you don't see both
file, then what does not 'safely ignoring' the file do? Is it unsafe
to delete the file in some cases?
And how does the file get put back together? Does the OS know how to
do this?
"The second new file has the name of the original file prefixed by a
"._ " and contains the resource fork of the original file. If you see
both files, the ._ file can be safely ignored. Sometimes when
deleting a file, the ._ component will not be deleted. If this occurs
you can safely delete the ._ file."
Tom
On Mar 9, 2006, at 12:03 PM, Robert Brenstein wrote:
>> Francis,
>>
>>> One more small point. When I drop my files onto (would
>>> you believe it ?) a Lexar JumpDrive, and move to the PC,
>>> I find that I have twice the files I thought. I get the same
>>> number of Alias ? files, equivalent to the files I copied.
>>> How do I remove this problem ?
>>>
>>
>> I have simply ignored the files that whose names start with "._".
>>
>> I suspect these files contain the resource fork data -- if the
>> file has any. Since Rev stacks have nothing in the resource fork,
>> it shouldn't be an issue...and hasn't been for moi.
>>
>> Rob Cozens, CCW
>> Serendipity Software Company
>
>
> For those wondering about those ._ files, here is the explanation
> from the "guilty" party, Apple itself:
>
> http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=106510
>
> For most files, these ._ are actually empty and in case of Rev
> stacks safely ditched.
>
> Robert
>
Thomas J McGrath III
3mcgrath at adelphia.net
Lazy River Software™ - http://www.lazyriversoftware.com
Lazy River Metal Art™ - http://www.lazyriversoftware.com/metal.html
Meeting Wear™ - http://www.cafepress.com/meetingwear
Semantic Compaction Systems - http://www.minspeak.com
SCIconics, LLC - http://www.sciconics.com/sciindex.html
More information about the use-livecode
mailing list