rotating images...

[Ken Ray]

On 6/26/06 1:19 AM, "Judy Perry" <jperryl at ecs.fullerton.edu> wrote:

> And it looks less crappy than rotate?
> 
> (sorry, haven't tried it... was so underwhelmed by rotate that I just gave
> up).

Actually, they look the same to me, but the image doesn't look too bad with
the exception of a funky border.

The main difference is that "rotate" is desctructive and "angle" isn't.
Compare:

set the angle of img 1 to 33
set the angle of img 1 to 0

vs.

rotate img 1 by 33
rotate img 1 by -33


Ken Ray
Sons of Thunder Software
Web site: http://www.sonsothunder.com/
Email: kray at sonsothunder.com