send "subCheckNow" to me, or?

[Mark Smith]

On 7 Jul 2006, at 21:02, Garrett Hylltun wrote:

> I think at the moment I'd better stick to using send until I can  
> find out whether the engine will get mucked up by using just the  
> handler name.

For doing what you're doing, I think 'send' is the way to go. Since  
you're putting waits in there anyway, any small speed advantage from  
not using 'send' is irrelevent anyway, and I think you would be  
buliding up a potentially enormous amount of recursion the other way,  
though you should get a 'too much recursion' error rather than a  
crash, as such.

Best,

Mark